Cypriot anger at Cherie land case

Cypriot President Tassos Papadopolous has criticised Cherie Blair's decision to represent a British couple in a land dispute in divided Cyprus.

Mrs Blair, a lawyer, said she will represent Linda and David Oram, who have been embroiled in a row over their home in northern Cyprus.

President Papadopolous said it was "provocative" for the wife of the prime minister to be involved in such a case.

But Downing Street said she was acting purely in her professional capacity.

Property threat

"It's a provocative action as it is difficult to separate her professional capacity from being the wife of the British prime minister," Mr Papadopolous said. "We will take the issue up with Britain."

Mr and Mrs Oram had built a house on land bought in the village of Lapithos in northern Cyprus. They were ordered to pay compensation to a Greek Cypriot refugee, Meletis Apostolides, who left his home when Turkish troops landed in 1974.

A court in Cyprus threatened to seize the Orams' property in England if they did not comply.

Because the ruling cannot be enforced in the northern part of Cyprus - a state which only Turkey recognises - Greek Cypriot lawyers have taken the dispute to the British High Court.

Cyprus has become part of the EU, which gives it greater strength for the Cypriot court to seize property in Britain.

The Cypriot government estimates there are as many as 10,000 foreigners with Greek Cypriot property in the north.

BBC NEWS 17/12/2005

Cherie attacked over Cyprus case

DAILY MAIL 17th December 2005

Cherie Blair has come under fire from the Greek Cypriot president for becoming involved in a British couple's land dispute on the divided island.

Tassos Papadopoulos suggested that her position as the Prime Minister's wife could compromise her in the legal battle, calling her decision "provocative".

And he said he would raise the barrister's role as lead counsel in the case, in which the Britons have been ordered to demolish their villa, with the Government.

Downing Street insisted that Mrs Blair was acting purely in her professional capacity as a senior barrister.

And the firm of solicitors which has been fighting the legal battle said it was "unfortunate" that the case had been politicised by the president.

A Cyprus court ordered British couple Linda and David Oram to demolish a two-storey villa they built on land in Lapithos village in northern Cyprus.

It also ordered them to pay compensation to a Greek Cypriot refugee for illegally using his land and threatened to confiscate their home in Britain.

An appeal is pending in Cyprus but prosecutors have now brought the action to the High Court in the UK in a bid to have it enforced.

It cannot be enforced in the Turkish-controlled north, which has been split from the rest of the island since the 1974 invasion but Cyprus' membership of the EU now gives it the opportunity to press for seizure of the UK property in British courts.

There have been a number of similar cases, mainly relating to land said to have been seized illegally from Greek Cypriots forced to flee the north of the island.

 

Cherie Blair steps into Cyprus land row
By Jean Christou

CHERIE Blair, wife of the British Prime Minister, has plunged into the Cyprus quagmire, when it emerged yesterday that she was representing a British couple accused of illegally buying Greek Cypriot property in the north.

Tony Blair’s barrister wife is taking part in the defence of David and Linda Orams, who are appealing a Nicosia court decision ordering them to demolish the house they built on the property of Meletios Apostolides in Lapithos.

Under EU rules, the British High Court has registered the Nicosia judgment and the Orams have until Wednesday to appeal in the UK.

Speaking on his return from Brussels yesterday, President Tassos Papadopoulos said the Foreign Ministry had made strong representations to the British High Commission after hearing of Mrs Blair’s involvement in the Orams case.

Papadopoulos called the move “provocative”, saying it would stir the feelings of Greek Cypriots against Britain, as the case involved a human right violation.

“The Foreign Ministry has already made strong representations to the British High Commission,” Papadopoulos said. He said he had been told the decision was entirely that of Cherie Blair, whose professional career is conducted under her maiden name of Booth, and should not be given a political angle.

A brief statement by the British High Commission in Nicosia yesterday said: “Ms Cherie Booth QC is acting in a professional capacity. Any enquiries relating to her legal practice should be directed to her chambers, Matrix.”

Matrix confirmed to Reuters in London that it was working with a group of solicitors defending two Britons accused by a Greek Cypriot refugee of trespassing on his property in northern Cyprus.

“We are utterly astonished by the undertaking by Mrs Blair,” Government Spokesman Kypros Chrysostomides said yesterday. “This will no doubt hurt the feelings of all Greek Cypriots, particularly those displaced whose properties are being robbed and exploited by the occupation regime. It is not a question of human rights of Mrs Orams but of the violation of human rights of the original owners of the property. This is not only a question of embarrassment for the British Prime Minister, but diplomatically, it’s very sensitive.”

Chrysostomides said Mrs Blair was undertaking to represent one of the many hundreds of Britons who are illegally trespassing, “giving the impression the official policy of the British government is to support illegality.”

He said the High Commission in Nicosia had tried to justify the situation. “But the justification is thin,” he added. Political parties on the island also condemned the move yesterday, but Costantinos Candounas, the lawyer representing Apostolides against the Orams couple, told the Sunday Mail he was unfazed by having to come up against Mrs Blair in a British court.

“Obviously she is very well respected and very competent and I look forward to the case. She will be a formidable opponent,” he said. Candounas said he did not believe the fact that the British Prime Minister’s wife was involved in the case would affect the judgment of the British court.

Turkish mainland newspaper Hurriyet reported yesterday that Cherie Blair had in May visited Istanbul, where she had meetings with the Orams’ Turkish Cypriot lawyers.

Copyright © Cyprus Mail 18/12/2005

 

Cherie Booth's role in Cyprus land dispute angers president

Helena Smith in Athens
Monday December 19, 2005
The Guardian

The president of Cyprus, Tasson Papadopoulos, has condemned Cherie Booth for agreeing to defend a British couple in a land dispute that has become one of the most sensitive issues on the island. He said the prime minister's wife was behaving provocatively by agreeing to represent the pair in the high-profile case.

"It is difficult to separate her professional capacity from being the wife of the British prime minister," said Mr Papadopoulos, who is also a British-trained barrister. "We will take this issue up with Britain."

Article continues

---

Advertisement

---

Downing Street insisted Ms Booth was acting purely in her professional capacity as a leading QC. The spat erupted after Ms Booth's chambers, Matrix, confirmed at the weekend that she would be heading the defence of David and Linda Orams, the couple ordered by a Greek Cypriot court last year to demolish their home in Turkish-run northern Cyprus.

In a move with possible repercussions for other UK citizens owning holiday retreats in the outlawed republic, Mr and Mrs Oram were also ordered to return the property to Meletis Apostolides, the Greek Cypriot refugee who owned the plot before war split the island in 1974.

Ms Booth's involvement became known after the test case was lodged by Mr Apostolides' lawyer with the high court in London. As a specialist in European human rights law, Ms Booth is believed to have been approached by the Orams' London-based Turkish Cypriot solicitor, Hassan Vahid.

Speaking from Nicosia, the refugee's solicitor said: "As the Greek Cypriot court's judgment cannot be enforced in northern Cyprus because of the island's division, we used EU regulations to have it registered and applied against the Orams' assets in the UK."

Mr and Mrs Oram, who were accused of trespassing on Mr Apostolides' property, have refused to comply with the Greek Cypriot ruling. If, however, the judgment is upheld by the high court, their home in Hove could be seized by the Greek Cypriot refugee. The couple have until Thursday to appeal.

An estimated 10,000 Europeans are thought to have invested in the enclave, a breakaway territory recognised only by Turkey. Most, like the Orams, are Britons attracted to the outlawed state by the bargain prices of properties often forcibly abandoned by Greek Cypriots in 1974.

But growing numbers of refugees - encouraged by Mr Apostolides' success and by Cyprus obtaining EU status - have vowed to press ahead with legal action.

Ms Booth's decision to take on the case was tantamount to condoning the Orams' "illegal trespassing," said Kypros Chrysostomides, the island's government spokesman, adding: "We are astonished by this undertaking. This is diplomatically very sensitive."

Cherie case provokes diplomatic row

The Prime Minister's wife is defending a couple accused of illegally building a villa in Cyprus

CHERIE BOOTH, QC, is at the centre of a diplomatic row after defending a British couple accused of illegally building a house on forcibly abandoned Greek Cypriot land in northern Cyprus.

 

 

 President Papadopoulos of Cyprus intends to complain to the British Government about her role. "It’s a provocative action, as it is difficult to separate her professional capacity from being the wife of the British Prime Minister," he said.

Ms Booth, a member of Matrix chambers, which specialises in human rights and international cases, has been the subject of abuse in the Greek Cypriot media. One newspaper said that she was "counsel to the embezzlement" of Greek Cypriot property; another described her as "an advocate to crime".

The British High Commission in Nicosia said: "Cherie Booth, QC, is acting in a professional capacity. Any inquiries relating to her legal practice should be directed to her chambers, Matrix."

No one at Matrix was available for comment yesterday.

The row comes at a time of poor relations between Britain and its former colony, where many Greek Cypriots are convinced that London is biased towards Turkey. The British Government has championed Turkey’s case for entry to the European Union.

Ms Booth will be helping to represent Linda and David Orams, from Hove, who built a villa with a swimming pool in the village of Lapithos in northern Cyprus, investing about £160,000. In April a court in the south of the island, where the Greek Cypriot Government represents Cyprus internationally, ordered the couple to demolish the house, return the plot of land and pay the original, displaced title-holder damages of nearly £10,000.

Because of the island’s divided status, the court is powerless to enforce its ruling in the selfdeclared Turkish Cypriot state, which is recognised only by Turkey.

But lawyers for Meletis Apostolides, the original Greek Cypriot landowner, have registered the judgment with the British High Court under European law, which could result in a compensation claim against the Orams’ British assets.

The couple have until December 22 to appeal against the case’s registration in Britain. It could be the first time that the High Court has tested a 2001 regulation from the European Council that judgments in one EU member country can be enforced in another.

A parallel appeal by the Orams, who say that they acquired the property in good faith from a displaced Turkish Cypriot, is also being heard in the Greek Cypriot courts.

Constantis Candounas, Mr Apostolides’s British-trained lawyer, said that he had no qualms about his team coming up against Ms Booth and her legal team in London. "She has a very good reputation as a competent lawyer and I look forward to the whole case in London," he said. "The British High Court will not be deciding on the merits of the case but rather on legal points and whether this judgment can be enforced in Britain."

Many Greek Cypriots hope that the attention drawn to the case by Ms Booth’s involvement will highlight the risk of buying disputed property in northern Cyprus.

The island has been divided since Turkish troops invaded northern Cyprus in 1974 after a short-lived Greek-inspired coup in Nicosia, which displaced 167,000 Greek Cypriots and 40,000 Turkish Cypriots.

Hundreds of foreign homeowners, mostly Britons, this year formed a UK-registered lobby group to protect their interests.

All United Nations settlement plans in the past have acknowledged the property rights of dispossessed Cypriots, and promised compensation for those who may not be able to return to their homes. Concerns among Greek Cypriots over the property issue was one of the reasons that they voted down a comprehensive settlement plan last year drawn up by Kofi Annan, the UN Secretary-General.

The Foreign Office warns those buying homes in the internationally unrecognised Turkish Cypriot state that they could face legal action in Cyprus and elsewhere in the EU, including Britain.


THE TIMES 19/12/2005